<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brisbane&#8217;s 470-meter Solar-powered Footbridge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dirt.asla.org/2009/11/05/brisbanes-470-meter-solar-powered-footbridge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dirt.asla.org/2009/11/05/brisbanes-470-meter-solar-powered-footbridge/</link>
	<description>Connecting the Built &#38; Natural Environments</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:37:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pabart</title>
		<link>http://dirt.asla.org/2009/11/05/brisbanes-470-meter-solar-powered-footbridge/#comment-4446</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pabart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirt.asla.org/?p=3282#comment-4446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the figures nominated (36,000), perhaps there could be a case to argue that the bridge is &#039;overkill&#039;.
But this is a case of the infrastructure paralleling /  preceeding development. Unfortunately the article only trumpets &#039;the bridge&#039;; 
but it is a bridge which gives access to an area within 2 kilometres of the city centre which will become a hotspot for urban renewal.
It is also another way to cross the river which historically has divided the city
It is a bridge that gives easy and direct access to a world class art gallery complex
It is a bridge that allows pedestrians and cyclists to cross the river in comfort, able to enjoy the view and the experience, without the accompanying traffic.
Unfortunately the article triumphs the bridge - which is a revelation; but it is the potential of the bridge which is the best part of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the figures nominated (36,000), perhaps there could be a case to argue that the bridge is &#8216;overkill&#8217;.<br />
But this is a case of the infrastructure paralleling /  preceeding development. Unfortunately the article only trumpets &#8216;the bridge&#8217;;<br />
but it is a bridge which gives access to an area within 2 kilometres of the city centre which will become a hotspot for urban renewal.<br />
It is also another way to cross the river which historically has divided the city<br />
It is a bridge that gives easy and direct access to a world class art gallery complex<br />
It is a bridge that allows pedestrians and cyclists to cross the river in comfort, able to enjoy the view and the experience, without the accompanying traffic.<br />
Unfortunately the article triumphs the bridge &#8211; which is a revelation; but it is the potential of the bridge which is the best part of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://dirt.asla.org/2009/11/05/brisbanes-470-meter-solar-powered-footbridge/#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirt.asla.org/?p=3282#comment-912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[36,000 per year? Does that number warrant the need for a 63 milllion dollar bridge?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 per year? Does that number warrant the need for a 63 milllion dollar bridge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

