California Prepares to Shut Parks in Effort to Close Budget Gap

Arnold Schwarzenegger, governor of California, is trying to close a massive USD 26 billion budget gap, and has suggested that California can no longer keep its parks open. The Guardian (UK) writes: “It is hard to envisage a no-entry sign tagged to a towering redwood tree. But the recession – writ on an epic scale in California’s proposal to close 220 state parks – is forcing the American public to confront the closure of the great outdoors.” 

According to the Guardian (UK), conservationists are arguing California can’t afford to close its parks. “Conservationists believe parks can withstand a year or so of closure without lasting harm. But fewer ranger stations will mean increased risk of vandalism, and less maintenance will lead to environmental degradation.” Additionally, one conservationist argues that parks are, in fact, revenue earners for the state. Tim Gibbs, program manager at the National Parks Conservation Association, said in comments to the Guardian: “Each visitor to a state park is worth $57 per visit. The parks have generated millions throughout California. It’s almost as if they are shooting themselves in the foot.”

The U.S. federal government seems to agree. “And this week the federal government appeared to partly agree, with the National Parks Service threatening to seize some of the sites if Schwarzenegger goes ahead with the closures.” The U.S. federal government’s National Park Service issued a warning letter to Governor Schwarzenegger that it would “use protection clauses under the original land deeds to the states, so as to take control of six parks in the San Francisco area, the dunes around the Big Sur and elsewhere.”

A proposed park shut-down would impact 80 percent of California’s natural preserves, historic parks, and recreation areas, and limit access to 30 percent of the state’s coastline. “Affected areas would stretch from the mountains of the Sierra Nevadas to the beaches and wetlands of Big Sur, and to the deserts of San Diego, where some of the last peninsular bighorn sheep roam.” 

The Huffington Post said Schwarzenegger’s proposal would trim “$ 70 million in parks spending through June 30, 2010. An additional $143.4 million would be saved in the following fiscal year by keeping the parks closed.” California legislators rejected Governor Schwarzenegger’s plans to close parks last year.

Read the article and California’s proposal for shutting parks.

3 thoughts on “California Prepares to Shut Parks in Effort to Close Budget Gap

  1. Andy in Germany 07/14/2009 / 1:35 pm

    Why can’t california do something more imaginative, like shutting down one lane of all the highways for a year? that would save on highway maintenance and over time reduce pollution because people would drive less. Even better, why not make those lanes cycle lanes where possible? Or bus only lanes where not. One bus causes less damage than lots of cars and carries as many people.

  2. Bob 07/22/2009 / 8:27 am

    Andy–get real–you obvioulsly have no idea about the reality of the situation as evidenced by such a comment.

  3. M. D. Vaden of Oregon 12/07/2010 / 11:05 pm

    Actually, Andy might have a good suggestion depending on how its applied.

    Like suppose the state shut down certain highways or buildings for certain periods of time, like overnight. Or for one day out of 5 for buildings. That could reduce law enforcement or energy use.

    In fact, the US Postal service is sort of headed that direction if they cull one day per week from the delivery of mail.

    Back to the parks, they sure don’t have that situation under control.

    In addition, the park camping was raised to $35 per night. In my case, I now stay in clean $50 motel instead, since its only a difference of $15 which I recover anyway by not towing my trailer.

    And that leaves more hiking and exploring time since I don’t need to set up or tear down camp in the middle of the day.

    At least in my case (and others I talked to) that decision brought a loss of revenue. It would be no surprise if they just broke-even on the decision. Although at the expense of building an expensive reputation which can backfire in the future.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s