Landscapes Can Be Open-ended

operative

In Operative Landscapes: Building Communities Through Public Space, Alissa North, Assistant Professor in the Landscape Architecture Program at the University of Toronto, argues that the best contemporary landscape designs are concerned with more than just aesthetics. Instead of striving for fixed, static designs, the goals of these landscapes are “operational”: they aim to guide “the transformation of urban environments over time.” By moving away from fixed form, landscapes can be open-ended and non-prescriptive, changing in response to — but also influencing — the development of their communities. North makes a case for “operative landscape design” through a collection of case studies oriented around a series of short essays. By equally weighting real-world examples and abstract theory, this book can be interpreted as an attempt to ground some of the concepts found in landscape urbanism. Operative Landscapes attempts to connect theory to practice.

Operative Landscapes is divided into five sections, each representing a phase of the design process: conceptualize, plan, develop, construct, and evolve. Each section is introduced by a short essay, followed by a series of case studies that explain the concepts in the essay. The “conceptualize” section looks at projects that build on the histories of existing sites. By establishing themselves as part of larger historical narratives, these projects strengthen connections to communities. For instance, the redesign of Cristal Park by Klotzli Friedli Landscape architects in Biel, Switzerland strategically inserts new landscape elements into an existing public space. Instead of treating the site as a blank slate, the designers carefully preserve and build on many existing elements on the site, including opportunistic vegetative growth and unplanned footpaths. By designing around existing elements, the designers retain much of the new park’s history and character while allowing for a greater diversity of recreational opportunities.

cristal

The “plan” section looks at master-planned communities that are driven by networks of public space. For instance, Masdar City, a brand-new city built in the desert of Abu Dhabi designed by Foster+Partners, is oriented around a series of flexible public spaces intended to allow for many uses. This was one example where I felt the case study did not really line up with the theory: while this project is certainly interesting, I am not sure if this kind of top-down urban design really embodies the kind of open-ended, reciprocal relationship between public space and urban form described earlier. While the public spaces in Masdar City may be flexible and non-prescriptive, the overall urban form of the city seems to be entirely designed from above. What “operative” effect will these public spaces have on Masdar over-time?

masdar
In the “develop” section, we see projects that involve the conversion of remnant or abandoned sites into public spaces, inciting reinvestment and redevelopment in their surrounding neighborhoods. “Construct” explores projects that dealt with unexpected construction challenges (frequently involving contamination), while “evolve” describes projects that change over time as they are used and adopted by their communities.

As North acknowledges, many of these projects fall across several categories. Indeed, the distinction between these categories, while each individually interesting, can be blurry. Despite this occasionally disorienting aspect, the book’s organization is appropriate to its subject matter – each section represents a way landscapes can operate in their communities.

Operative Landscapes provides a timely collection of case studies that demonstrate the capacity of landscape architecture to drive urban design. Sometimes its language tends toward impenetrable design-speak. Also, it might be more successful if it devoted more space to fewer case studies. The explanations of the presented works can be brief.

Still, by exploring urban design through the relationship between community and public space, North successfully establishes not only the aesthetic and ecological significance of landscape-driven urban designs, but the critical role these places play in the daily lives of city dwellers.

Read the book.

This guest post is by Ben Wellington, Student ASLA, Master’s of Landscape Architecture Candidate, Louisiana State University.

Image credits: (1) Birkhauser, (2) Cristal Park Plan View / Klotzli Friedli Landscape architects, (3) Masdar City Master plan rendering / Foster + Partners

3 thoughts on “Landscapes Can Be Open-ended

  1. raquel penalosa architecte du paysage 01/09/2013 / 12:03 pm

    In reading the purpose of the book and the perspective brought by North, I can not but support this approach, long missing from the driven “form” oriented practice of landscape architecture for the last decade. It certainly requires a much more subtile and humble position to respond to this flexibility but I believe is the only response to embrace the lost leadership of landscape architecture on the current and future transformation of our cities, neighborhoods.

  2. D Andrews 01/10/2013 / 6:02 am

    I am a L.A. myself and fully believe in the need for greenspace and parks, sustainable drainage, etc., but to frame New Urbanism and Landscape Urbanism as polar opposites, seems to be only about landscape architects trying to become the dominating force behind urban ideology. Its as if we think its our turn to be king. I think the process of place-making is far more complex and to think realistically about long term global sustainability and community cohesion, we need not focus on high minded ideology. Rather we ought to use our expertise and understanding of ecology, human scaled spaces, etc. and get to working with all design fields and communities to create neighborhoods of realistically priced houses for all people to live in, easy access to human scaled greenspaces, and whatever it takes to promote a little bit of interaction with your neighbor. I am fearful landscape architects will jump on the bandwagon of landscape urbanism because it sounds cool and uses big words. New Urbanism seems pretty rationally minded when applied to trying to regenerate and improve town centers and cities. Not so much of a fan of they ol’ gated communities i must say, but hey, you can’t win em all…

  3. Adriana Saccone 01/24/2013 / 7:04 pm

    D Andrews, estoy en un todo de acuerdo contigo. Soy Paisajista y tengo un Estudio de Arquitectura y Paisaje con un arquitecto y una ayudante arquitecta.
    Tu opinión es sensible y justa¡
    Acuerdo en todo.
    Adriana Saccone

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s