Architectural Record and the Van Alen Institute have created a new survey meant to mine the design world’s complex feelings about competitions. The survey, which takes just about 10 minutes to complete, is sure to collect some fascinating data on what motivates designers to enter competitions, how they would like to see the format improved, and what they have gained or lost from participating. The sponsors say the “survey results will help catalyze the development of new models for this highly charged” practice.
In one section, the survey aims to uncover just how truly interdisciplinary those interdisciplinary teams are in these competitions. There are questions like: “How frequently are you required to work with other design professions (e.g. architecture, landscape architecture, planning, etc.) in the design competitions you have entered? How frequently are you required to work with other non-design professions (e.g. finance, ecology, social sciences, etc.) in the design competitions you have entered? What professions outside of design would you like to work with on a competition?”
Other interesting questions ask respondents to think more broadly about the role competitions play in focusing our attention on critical issues. “What do you think has been the most interesting or influential design competitions of the last decade and why? What sites or issues do you think future competitions should address?”
The survey doesn’t address student design competitions explicitly.
Results will be presented at a conference organized by the Van Alen Institute and Harvard University’s Graduate School of Design on April 23-24 and also be made available online.
A few lucky random respondents will receive prizes like an iPad Mini, Bose QuietComfort noise-cancelling headphones, a Nespresso Vertuoline espresso maker, and a $200 gift card to MoMA Design Store.