Feeds:
Posts
Comments

footbridge
A 470-meter solar-powered footbridge recently opened in Brisbane’s Central Business District, writes Inhabitat. The footbridge, designed by Cox Architects, an Australian firm, cost $63 million. Approximately 36,000 pedestrians and bikers are expected to use the bridge per year. 

According to Inhabitat, the LED lighting system is designed for maximum energy efficiency and will be used for festivals along the river. The LED ligh system is powered by 84 solar panels mounted on the bridge, which can ”generate a daily output of 100KWh and an average yearly output of 38MWh.”

The solar panel system will provide enough energy to light the bridge in most instances. When the bridge is fully illuminated, it must receive 25 percent of its energy from the central grid. During the day, howerver, the bridge will return energy to the central grid.

TreeHugger added that the footbridge is expected to save 37.8 tonnes of carbon emissions each year.

Read the article and see more photos.

fortvancouver
Gustafson Guthrie Nichols and Allied Works won a design competition to create a park that will span an Interstate and connect a two-block section of Washington State’s Fort Vancouver national historic site with the City of Vancouver’s downtown. The design will include a ”landscape cap” that will extend south from the existing “Evergreen Boulevard” span over the interstate.

According to The Oregonian, “a central walkway would connect downtown to the historic area. Smaller wood pathways would branch out to various pockets of the park, such as the Northwest Meadow and the reflective pond. Native plants would fill the park, basalt stone paving would create the paths, and recycled auto glass would form transparent fissure walls.” The Columbian added that the design will include “a water wall and ‘Sound Grove’ artwork. Curved steel boughs would swivel on steel posts as wind passes through the artwork. As the boughs move, they would emit low tones and create a harmonic sound.” 

The Daily Journal of Commerce Oregon writes that the design is part of the broader plan to replace an Interstate-5 bridge, a “multibillion-dollar Columbia River Crossing project whose future is unclear.” If the bridge does get built, federal rules require the additional landscape cap. 

Kathryn Gustafson, FASLA, researched the geology to create a plan for rebuilding what I-5 had destroyed. Gustafson told the Daily Journal of Commerce: “It’s all about the land. When you look at the land of Washington state, it has one of the most diverse geologies in the world.” According to Daily Journal of Commerce, Gustafson examined the “Mount St. Helens lava tubes, violent acts of simultaneous creation and destruction, for inspiration. In the winning concept, the freeway below becomes a grotto, with the forces of nature reshaping the landscape above.”

The design competition jurors said of the winning design: “The design by Gustafson Guthrie Nichol/Allied Works Architecture Team best responds to the vision of the Community Connector. It appropriately respects and celebrates the cultural history of Vancouver, truly connecting the Fort Vancouver National Site to the City. The design concept shows an understanding of the cultural history and significance of this Site. An adaptable design, it enhances the amenities on both sides as they are currently and as they could evolve into the future. The design concept provides a clarity and richness worthy of the vision of the project. It shows a spirit of place that is specific and appropriate for the Northwest. It honors the seasons and biology of the Pacific Northwest landscape and includes an elegant, yet practical, use of water.”

The mayor of Vancouver, Washington State, Royce Pollard, said the design would reconnect the historic site and local community, and undo the damage caused by the highway. “They cut a hole right through the heart of our community. They disconnected our history.”

Read more on the project

Image credit: Fort Vancouver, Washington State. Wikipedia Commons

sustainablesites
The Sustainable Sites Initiative released the nation’s first rating system for the design, construction and maintenance of sustainable landscapes, with or without buildings. A partnership of the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA), the Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center and the U.S. Botanic Garden, the Initiative’s rating system represents four years of work by dozens of the country’s leading sustainability experts, scientists and design professionals, as well as public input from hundreds of individuals and dozens of organizations to create this essential missing link in green design.  The announcement took place at the U.S. Botanic Garden in Washington.

“While carbon-neutral performance remains the holy grail for green buildings, sustainable landscapes move beyond a do-no-harm approach,” said Nancy Somerville, Executive Vice President and CEO of ASLA. “Landscapes sequester carbon, clean the air and water, increase energy efficiency, restore habitats and ultimately give back through significant economic, social and environmental benefits never fully measured until now.”

“We are facing unprecedented environmental challenges such as water scarcity and climate change that require fundamental changes in the way that we interact with the land,” said Susan Rieff, Executive Director of the Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center at The University of Texas at Austin. “This voluntary rating system and guidelines covers all aspects of working with outdoor spaces of all sizes, and provides information for designing landscapes that go beyond beauty to actually improving ecosystem health and the health of communities for generations to come.”                 

“Landscapes can give back,” said Holly H. Shimizu, Executive Director of the United States Botanic Garden. “We believe that as these guidelines become widely used, not only will they be as transformative to the landscape industry as LEED was to buildings, but more than that, they will allow built landscapes to be regenerative like natural landscapes, and assist in mitigating some of the most pressing environmental issues we face today. We need to acknowledge our landscapes’ value, treasure them and cultivate them sustainably and responsibly. The need is urgent, the time is now and these guidelines, when used correctly, are the tools.”

The rating system works on a 250-point scale, with levels of achievement for obtaining 40, 50, 60 or 80 percent of available points, recognized with one through four stars, respectively. If prerequisites are met, points are awarded through the 51 credits covering areas such as the use of greenfields, brownfields or greyfields; materials; soils and vegetation; construction and maintenance. These credits can apply to projects ranging from corporate campuses, transportation corridors, public parks and single-family residences. The rating system is part of two new reports issued from the Initiative, The Case for Sustainable Landscapes and Guidelines and Performance Benchmarks 2009

To test the rating system, the Sustainable Sites Initiative opened a call for pilot projects in conjunction with the release of the rating system. Any type of designed landscape is eligible, so long as the project size is at least 2,000 square feet. The call will remain open until February 15, 2010, and the initiative will work with and oversee the projects during the two-year process. 

Download and share the two new reports: The Case for Sustainable Landscapes and Guidelines and Performance Benchmarks 2009.

Read more about the call for pilot projects at www.sustainablesites.org/pilot

Image credit: Sustainable Sites Initiative

chicago_lurie
Frederick Marks, AIA, a partner with AC Martin, an architecture design firm, presented on the varied human responses to green design at the National Building Museum. Marks focused on recent developments in testing the value of sustainable architecture and landscapes, and asked: “Are they actually providing us with enhanced well-being?” Marks discussed his role as a founding member of the Academy of Neuroscience for Architecture, a group examining the growing body of knowledge on people’s behavior in the built environment. He then outlined the relationship between art and emotion, the differences between LEED green buildings and natural design, the importance of “evidence-based design,” and offered a range of building and landscape case studies that illustrate natural design concepts.

Humans share common emotions and emotions are aroused by art. However, the pleasure derived from looking at art has nothing do with the actual object represented in the art. As an example, he cited Andy Warhol’s seminal painting of a Campbell’s soup can. ”Unlike a Warhol painting, which we can enjoy without caring how the soup tastes, in the case of architecture, we do have to care how the soup tastes.” Marks argues that buildings and landscapes need to work as art and spaces for people to live and work in and interact with. He said architecture was the one form of art that breaks the mold.

On LEED-rated buildings, Marks sees “room for improvement.” “LEED has emphasized energy performance over human performance,” but do factor in light, air quality and temperature control. Citing Morphosis’s Caltrans building, which has a dramatic exterior, he pointed to the standard cubicle system found within the building as a poor use of a “sustainable space.” Additionally, another LEED-rated building, the Rand Corporation’s Santa Monica building, was designed for a “rich external experience.” Researchers at the think tank now all have offices and can see the ocean from their windows. The down side: no one talks to each other anymore. Marks pointed to the “propinquity effect,” which is often measured in 30-feet increments, to determine how communication rates change depending on how close you are to others.

Marks urged the use of “natural design,” and said there are some simple lessons to be learned from the natural world. Nature is built out of fractal structures. As an example, trees and the density of forests are fractals. “People may be attracted to nature because our nerve cells are also made of fractals.” One leading biologist, E.O. Wilson, said humans have an innate attraction to nature, and coined the term ”biophilia.” Steven Kellert, Yale University, expanded this into biophilic design. Buildings that successfully use biophilic design ideas “connect with the natural world.” These kinds of buildings can lower psychological and physiological stress. On the positive side: “Buildings can be built in fractals as well.”

Other designers are going one step further and building biomimetic buildings that “emulate nature’s best ideas to solve human problems” (see earlier post). Marks cited noted artist / scientist / landscape designer Patrick Blanc (see earlier post). Blanc looked at how some plants can grow without soil and incorporate these into green roofs and walls.

To fully test whether these ideas actually work, designer should use “evidence-based design,” a process of building and testing building design on credible research to optimize outcomes. Like a scientist who creates a hypothesis before conducting an experiment, landscape architects and architects should create a design hypothesis, a “statement about goals.” ”It’s rational that we approach buildings in this way.” Marks noted University of California, Berkeley’s Center for the Built Environment and its Occupant Indoor Environment Quality tools, which are being used to determine if LEED-rated buildings are really providing energy performance.

Another side of evidence-based design is the use of post-occupancy studies to test whether initial hypotheses actually worked. Testers can look at physiological rates of occupants — heart rates, blood pressure, skin conductivity. Marks also calls for “brain-mind analysis,” and was excited by the work of UCSD’s Calit2 StarCAVE, a leading virtual reality testing center. Through a virtual reality and using EEG, researchers can assess the effects of changes in the built environment on people. ”Emotions can operate without cognition.”

A range of building case studies used to illustrate natural design concepts:

Herman Miller Greenhouse, Holland, Michigan, William McDonough & Associates: Herman Miller, a high-end furniture design company, partnered with William McDonough & Associates and an environmental psychologist to conduct a post-occupancy analysis of its revamped manufacturing, office, and showroom facility in Michigan. After the renovation, which brought in more natural light and other natural elements, there was a 20 percent increase in “good spirits.” Also, 30 percent gave higher approval rating for social spaces, and 60 percent felt healthier. The improvements to the space led to increased productivity, but not reduced stress. “People just ended up working harder with their improved productivity.”

Interestingly, when the sun went down, the benefits from the natural design disappeared. “Productivity dropped for the late shift workers,” which led Marks to ask whether improved access to natural light wasn’t really the key ingredient in increased productivity. “Daylight suppresses depression and stress. Windows are good.”

Genzyme Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Behnisch Architects: Designed by Behnisch architects for a pharmaceutical company, the Genzyme center, a LEED-platinum building, yielded 57 percent increases in productivity. “The architects designed from the inside out and included tea gardens, connecting stairs, and public spaces.”

Regarding LEED-rated buildings, Urban Land recently concluded LEED-platinum buildings have resulted in $170 million in productivity gains. Companies are also using these features for employee retention.

Landscapes in the U.S. have primarily been lawns. “There is the history of the perfect lawn in the U.S.” The original concept of the lawn was the meadow, which was used for grazing. “The lawn became the symbol of democracy and discipline. It’s timeless but also monotonous.” With the rise of gardening, local food production, and productive landscapes, man-made lawns are now changing back into natural landscapes. “Landscapes can be purely sensual in comparison with architecture.”

Chicago Botanic Gardens’s Great Basin Gardens, Oehme Van Sweden & Associates: Marks urged people to examine what landscape architects do by looking carefully at the relationship between the plants, water, and paths in the Chicago Botanic Garden’s Great Basin. “Do we go fast or slow?” — the paths determine the speed with which people interact with the natural environment. Marks think the landscape’s success as a biophilic design is rooted in the “Aesthetics of Survival,” outlined by Susan Painter, PhD. The aesthetics outline a need for a refuge (a safe place); a prospect (a place from which you can see a long view of your surroundings), and water (which is rooted in the primeval need to be near water and able to rehydrate). Additionally, the site’s color stimulates. “Color influences mood, blood pressure, respiratory rates.”

Elizabeth and Nona Evans Restorative Gardens, Cleveland Botanic Gardens, Dirtworks: The restorative garden within the Cleveland Botanic Garden is a “garden for contemplation,” and offer keyhole and expansive views. There are also intimate areas that offer views to greater landscapes (meeting the above-mentioned “aesthetics of survival”). In the healing garden, there are “positive distractions” so stress is lowered. “You can touch, hear, see, smell mosses, succulents, cool ferns, and grasses, which works even for the blind.” Horticultural therapy is accessible to all users.

Lurie Garden, Millennium Park, Gustafson Guthrie Nichol Ltd: There are shrubs and trees in one area and openess and brightness in other areas. “By day you can rest and reflect, and by night, there is movement through the gardens.”

High Line, New York City, Field Operations, Piet Oudolf and Diller, Scofidio + Renfro: The High Line “incorporates everything I am talking about,” contends Marks. “There are changes in natural plants and hardscapes as you move along the trails.” There are tapered edges and seams, a strategy to slow things down. “The High Line creates the sense that you are in another place, outside NYC’s grid.”  

Image credit: The Lurie Garden, Millennium Park, Chicago, Illinois. Gustafson Guthrie Nichol Ltd, Seattle, Washington

canal_restoration
Jeffersonville, Indiana, plans to change a street near the Ohio River into 40-foot wide canal and 3/4-mile pedestrian promenade. The plan is expected to improve the town’s ability to sustainably manage stormwater and enable pedestrians to more easily walk to stores and local attractions.  The town’s mayor sees the plan addressing both environmental and economic needs at once.

According to the Architect’s Newspaper, heavy rain in the area causes sewer overflow and runoff. To meet the Environmental Protection Agency’s requirements, which prohibit sewage overflow into the Ohio River, the town decided to go sustainable and create a combined bioswale and canal stormwater management system. “Rather than build a conventional underground stormwater sewer and retention basin, the canal would perform the same function in an environmentally sustainable manner.”  Jeffersonville’s assistant director of planning and zoning, Brian Fogle, told Architect’s Newspaper that the ”rainwater will flow through landscaped bio-swales to be filtered and partially absorbed into the ground before it is channeled into the canal, where it can be stored or pumped to the Ohio River.” 

The town’s mayor, Tom Galligan, wants to invest in the plan because he thinks the canal can meet the EPA’s requirements, provide sustainable stormwater management, and boost economic activity downtown. “Mayor Galligan envisions a mix of privately developed shops, restaurants, and nightlife lining the canal to draw tourists. Proposed residential development will tie in with historic neighborhoods that line the project area. The water feature will serve as a linear park connecting the Ohio River Greenway with the core of the city.”

Project funding is coming from a variety of sources, including ”a combination of local and federal sewer and drainage funds, grants, and private investment.” Addtionally, the city may look into “tax increment financing in the adjacent urban enterprise zone.”

Read the article

On a larger scale in a major city, the Cheongyecheon canal restoration project in Seoul, Korea has also boosted economic activity and improved environmental quality downtown. (see earlier post and details on a park within the award-winning canal project).

Image credit: Architect’s Newspaper / Jeffersonville DPZ

sustainable_plans
The focus of this year’s American Planning Association AICP National Symposium, held at the National Building Museum, was planning sustainable communities. Beth Osborne, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy at the Department of Transportation (DOT) and Shelley Poticha, Senior Advisor for Sustainable Communities, Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), two key policymakers involved in the new federal partnership on livable communities, gave presentations on federal developments. Tim Brennan, Pioneer Valley Planning Commission (PVPC), and Joseph Schilling, Professor at Virginia Tech’s Alexandria Center, and head of the Metropolitan Institute’s Green Region’s Initiative, also spoke about regional and local sustainable planning initiatives. In introducing the sessions, Paul Farmer, CEO of the APA asked: “How do we operationalize sustainable communities?” Jason Jordan, APA’s head of policy and government affairs, said “sustainability isn’t just about environmental sustainability. We have to look at the triple bottom line. Sustainability is about economic competitiveness and resilient communities as well.” One goal of the session was to examine how planning is critical to sustainable community development.

Beth Osborne, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Transportation Policy, DOT: Sustainable transportation is about having “multiple convenient transportation options.” Osborne said a number of people have defined “livable or sustainable communities” differently, but she prefers this definition: “it means being able to walk from your house to get a slice of pizza.” Ray LaHood, U.S. Transportation Secretary, has defined a livable community as a place where “you don’t have to use a car if you don’t want to.”

Osborne rhetorically asked “Why is the federal government involved in planning livable communities?” The reason: transportation costs are lower in walkable communities. As an example, she noted that Washington, D.C. has shed 4,000 cars in the past year. Money spent on cars now goes into the D.C. local economy. Increasing walking and biking access also improves communities’ economic resiliency. “Some communities must use their cars and are therefore vulnerable if gas prices increase or the economy falters.”

Osborne noted that car-dependent communities also have a 40 percent higher overall CO2 footprint. Planning must play a role because CAFE standards won’t reduce emissions alone. As an example, Osborne cited Salt Lake City, which is focusing development in built-up areas, and has saved $4.5 billion in avoided transportation infrastructure costs as a result. More high-density communities are needed. ”30 percent of the population wants to live in high-density communities, but only 2 percent of U.S. communities are like this. As a result, these areas are expensive to live in.”

Shelley Poticha, Senior Advisor for Sustainable Housing and Communities, HUD: Poticha said regions are now the economic engines of the U.S. “Regions need to be strong, viable, and innovative. Other countries already recognize this. The U.S. is behind on this.” Outlining the new HUD-EPA-DOT partnership on livable communities (see earlier post), Poticha said it’s the result of “inter-disciplinary thinking.” The agencies are now collaborating on funding decisions, and all review discretionary spending on the TIGER grant program (see ASLA’s guide to economic stimulus opportunities) and smart growth discretionary spending programs.

“The goal is to embed sustainable ideas into communities,” Poticha argued. To that end, the partnership is created a set of performance measures, including an affordability index, which will be the first to combine housing and transportation costs and give a true picture of the cost of living and working in an area.

The heads of EPA, HUD, and DOT recently went on a tour of sustainable community best practices, viewing projects in Chicago, Denver, and Dubuque.

Tim Brennan, Pioneer Valley Planning Commission (PVPC), Central Massachusetts: Brennan argued that the “region, not the state or city, is now the important piece of geography. The region is the city of the past.” Massachusetts has 13 regional planning agencies. Brennan’s area is the size of Rhode Island and covers older urban towns, universities, and contains mostly small business. To turn his sustainable comprehensive planning into reality, Brennan asked all local elected officials in his region to sign an “intergovernmental compact,” committing themselves to the sustainable development plan his team put together through extensive collaboration with local organizations. “A collaborative planning approach is needed to get a plan implemented.” Read PVPC’s plans.

His region’s goals are to reduce C02 emissions, replace outdated energy infrastructure, clean-up brownfield sites, and connect environmental reforms to economic development. “The region doesn’t have good data on C02 emissions, but we set targets.” The biggest challenge, Brennan contends, is transportation-related emissions. “We must end car addiction. Transportation is more about land use than transportation. People need to move closer to where they work.” According to Brennan, the next challenge is to create 22nd century plans that connect “the economy, environment, transportation, and energy.”

Joseph Schilling, Research Professor, Virgina Tech’s Alexandria Center, and Metropolitan Institute’s Green Regions Initiative: Schilling outlined aspects of the eco-Alexandria initiative, an effort to make one of the oldest communities in the U.S. more sustainable through planning. Schilling brought in students from his program and conducted public reviews as part of a comprehensive eco-city planning process. Key eco-city players included the mayor and city council, environmental policy commission, office of environmental quality, and a local environmental planning group. Read more on the Eco-Alexandria plan.

Image credit: A Civic Vision and Action Plan for the Central Delaware River, Philadelphia, PA. Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC, Philadelphia, PA

climbstairsgarden
Now famous for its Frank Gehry-designed Guggenheim building, Bilbao continues to come up with unique ideas to revitalize its city center through urban design. According to Metropolis POV, the city commissioned a master plan seven years ago for the Abandoibarra area in the city’s downtown. Bilbao then sponsored BilbaoJardín 2007, “a contest that solicited designs for garden plots of up to 80 square meters (about 860 square feet), to be built on scattered sites throughout the city.” The first competition received some 132 proposals and a total of 27 projects were built. The design competitition was renewed in 2009.

For 2009, Balmori Associates, a firm that worked on the downtown master plan, submitted a park, The Garden That Climbs Stairs. “Sited between two Arata Isozaki towers, the miniature urban park is an arresting combination of native and exotic plants sidling up the steps leading to Santiago Calatrava’s Nervion River Footbridge. (Seen from above, it kind of looks like a cross between The Blob and the High Line.)”

Read the article and view the 31 other winning projects at BilbaoJardín 2009.

Image credit: Metropolis POV. Iwan Baan/courtesy Balmori Associates

lurie_garden
Sadhu Johnston, Chief Environment Officer, Chicago city government, discusses Chicago’s forward-thinking and comprehensive climate action plan at its one-year anniversary. Johnston outlines progress in key areas, including green roof and stormwater management infrastructure, building energy efficiency (including new rules on reflective roofs), renewable energy, and sustainable transportation systems.

Chicago’s many city agencies has spent the past year turning the broader climate action plan into specific implementation plans. While this intra-government process continues, Johnston says the city has already exceeded benchmarks in some key areas. As an example, Johnston contends Chicago has dramatically expanded its rooftop green infrastructure – there is now seven million square feet of green roof. “We already have over seven million square feet of green roofs underway in the city of Chicago. That’s way ahead of where we thought we would be at this point.”

To further spur development of the city’s green roofs, Chicago is tying them in with sustainable stormwater management plans. “We couldn’t give credit to a new development for installing a green roof until we passed our storm water ordinance a couple of years ago. Now, every new development is required to calculate stormwater runoff and figure out how they can keep at least a half-inch of that first rain onsite for utilization and bioswales, green roofs, or other green infrastructure, like permeable pavements. Green roofs can play a significant role in stormwater plans for each site.”

On building energy efficiency, the city has made progress in a variety of ways. “We’ve exceeded the number of residential retrofits that we expected to retrofit this year. Through the Green Office Challenge, we had more people, more high-rise buildings, join us than we expected.” Additionally, Chicago recently updated its city-wide building codes, which now includes “unique features” such as cool or reflective roof rules. ”One of the accomplishments we achieved early on in the plan was passing a new energy code. We passed the IECC 2006 code, which was the newest code at the time. There were a couple of unique elements. The first was a new reflective roofing component. We were one of the first to amend the code to require a higher reflectivity on roofing surfaces to address the urban heat island effect.”

Chicago sees remaining urban brownfields as a key opportunities for expanding renewable energy capacity and is actively partnering with the private sector to find solutions. “We worked with Exelon to develop the world’s largest municipal solar installation. It’s a 40-acre brownfield site that’s been vacant for 30 years. We’re using the opportunity to put a ten-megawatt solar installation on the site, and bring it back to productive use without having to spend the 30 million dollars to clean it up. This allows us to park that site for about 25 years with solar installation while, hopefully, the rest of the area redevelops, allowing us to then clean up that site. There’s an example of something that just fell out of the sky. We were just at the right place, the right time, the right partnership.”

To further improve on the walking and biking transportation networks in the city, Chicago launched the Chicago 2015 bike plan, which fits in with the greater climate action and transit-oriented development (TOD) plans. Johnston says: “I’ve been Chair of the Mayor’s Bicycle Advisory Council, which involves working with 40-50 different non-profits and for-profits in town to ensure that we’re implementing the plan effectively. There’s a lot happening on biking. The part that really complements the climate action plan is the TOD component, which ensures that new developments tie into existing infrastructure seamlessly and support that infrastructure.” The involvment with community organizations has paid off: “We’ve added a lot of additional bike lanes and now have over 12,000 bike racks in the city. We’re working on a second bike commuter station because the first one has been just so successful.” 

Read the full interview

Image credit: The Lurie Garden, Millennium Park, Chicago, Illinois. Gustafson Guthrie Nichol Ltd, Seattle, Washington

bayou1
Barbara Boxer, Senator from California and chair of the Senate committee on the environment and public works, kicked off three days of hearings on the latest version of the Kerry-Boxer climate change legislation. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, Energy Secretary Steven Chu, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, and E.P.A. Administrator Lisa Jackson all spoke to the committee about their organizations’ plans for mitigating C02 emissions and adapting the U.S. to climate change. Salazar called for expanded landscape conservation cooperatives, which can protect critical carbon sinks and wildlife habitats. Salazar said landscape conservation cooperatives can serve as both wildlife migration corridors and a major part of a U.S. C02 bio-sequestration strategy. While preventing deforestation in developing countries like Brazil and Indonesia was crucial, the U.S. “also needs to focus on reforestation,” argues Salazar. U.S. lands are the key sources for biosequestration and geological sequestration of C02.

To support renewable energy production, the interior department has set aside 1,000 square miles of federal land for solar use. Solar installations on federal land could generate 100,000 megawatts of solar power. Hydropower, geothermal energy, and off-shore wind are other key renewable energy sources Salazar wants to promote.

In his remarks to the committee, Chu added that while moving quickly on climate change is critical to avoiding disaster, creating global and U.S. renewable industries also presents huge opportunities for U.S. firms. “Which countries are going to manufacture and export renewable energy technology? Which are going to be dependent on other countries for their solar panels and wind turbines?” Citing Energy Information Administration (EIA) figures, Chu argued that the combined global wind and solar markets will become multi-trillion markets within a few decades. “U.S. policy decisions now affect the size of the U.S. share of these future markets.” Chu added that China has already decided to aggressively target renewable energy markets and is now investing $9 billion per month in solar and other technologies. “The U.S. has already fall far behind. We are now producing just seven percent of the world’s solar panels.” 

Multiple speakers urged comprehensive and rapid action. Senator Kerry argued that science is “screaming at us to take action,” and a “voluntary approach won’t work.” Oceans are 30 percent more acidic, and scientific studies foresee no sea ice in the Artic in summer by 2013. Senator Ben Cardin of Maryland noted that there are already climate refugees in Maryland. Steven Chu quoted M.I.T. researchers: “There is a 17 percent change that there will be a 11 degree Fahrenheit increase by mid-century,” arguing that a 11 degree decrease in temperature would lead to a new ice age, so a 11 degree increase could lead to “unknown effects.”  

However, not all senators were convinced. Senator James Inhofe, ranking minority member of the committee, wondered about the costs of the bill in terms of jobs and economic growth. Other minority members complained about the fast pace of the legislative review, and argued for more detailed economic analyses of the impact of the legislation from the E.P.A.. Senator Voinovich asked: “Why try to jam the bill through?” Voinovich also wanted more economic analysis done on the cost of wind power versus nuclear power installations, arguing that nuclear power was more cost-effective given the high cost of creating transmission lines to bring wind power to cities. Other senators also called for a greater role for nuclear power in the legislation, saying that “100 new nuclear power plants would be cheaper.”

Senator Boxer and Kerry focused on the cost of the legislation per household, and argued the bill would create new green jobs. Boxer said that the new Senate climate change legislation would cost 30 cents per day per household. Senator Kerry said the bill would create hundreds of thousands of new green jobs that can’t be exported and pointed to a chart showing state-by-state net job increases. ”Energy produced in the U.S. equals jobs.” Kerry added that the information technology economy was $1 trillion; a new clean energy economy could be $6 trillion. “We will create 5-10 Google equivalents.”

Kerry noted that six more Senate committees will review the climate change legislation with expected mark-ups and votes on November 3.

The White House also contributed to the push for climate change legislation as well. President Obama toured a solar installation and also spoke on renewable energy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) last week.

Watch the next two days of hearing at C-SPAN.

Image credit: Brays Bayou Greenway Framework, Houston, TX. SWA Group, Houston, Texas

halprin
Lawrence Halprin, FASLA, one of the world’s leading landscape architects, passed away at the age of 93. His six-decade career encompassed such prominent works as the FDR Memorial in Washington, D.C.; Freeway Park in Seattle, Ghirardelli Square, Levi’s Plaza and the United Nation’s Plaza in San Francisco; among many others. In comments to The San Francisco Chronicle, Charles Birmbaum, FASLA, president of the Cultural Landscape Foundation, said: “He was the single most influential landscape architect of the postwar years. He redefined the profession’s role in cities.”

A Fellow of ASLA, Halprin also received the ASLA Medal in 1978 and the ASLA Design Medal in 2003. Among his many other accolades includes the 2002 National Medal of the Arts, the nation’s highest honor for an artist. At the 2007 ASLA Annual Meeting and EXPO, the closing general session featured a Q&A session with Halprin and Charles Birnbaum. Listen to the 30-minute podcast.

Read the San Francisco Chronicle’s appreciation and view photos of Halprin’s work. Also, read an obituary in The New York Times.

Additional information about his work can be found at this biography at The Cultural Landscape Foundation.

Image credit: Eric Luse / The San Francisco Chronicle

Older Posts »